By jove, I think I’ve got it—what TW’s new rebranding project is! It’s an attempt show the world that she is a ‘Super Earth Mumma’, who is a ‘present parent’, who fake reads bedtime stories to the invisible children, who bakes and cooks with cameras in the kitchen set up in every corner, and can run several secret squirrel companies hidden in Delaware, yet still does the school run.
In order to do that, she has to show that some children exist, so there is a glimpse of a hand, the back a head, a blurred foot, and a rehearsed line from them can be heard in the most recent video clips. The woman has been dying to get back on Instagram to show off her faux lifestyle and to merchandise whatever she can to get the freebies and cash, because that’s what it’s all about. There must be cameras set up all around the house to create content and to film things at different angles, and perhaps even the odd drone to get aerial footage. What she fails to do is to live in the moment and in the present, because she’s obsessed with creating a faux image of her lifestyle. TW can’t stay off social media, with her posting a posed image every day, so where is WME? Ted Sarandos of Netflix recently tried to claim that the show was successful because people are buying Hermès blankets and Loro Piana clothing— seriously? People who can afford to buy those items do so without any promotion from TW, and the average cult fan would have forfeit eating for a couple of months to buy those kind of items. It’s not all about ratings, but whether the public thought the show was any good, and even the sugar media struggled to find anything authentic or interesting.
I’ve been reading some of the comments from the fans of the show, and it’s quite clear that there is a specific audience—mainly the under educated who want to know how to fake it to make it, and the under class who have never been taught the basic skills of making a pasta dish, or a cup of tea. That’s all good and fine, but they should know that some of TW’s advice is not sensible or practical, and that includes leaving glass jars of tea out in the sun, as well as the dangerous bath salts mixture. I guess these are the people who would be interested in buying TW’s overpriced merchandise.
It’s been two weeks since the world has been ‘entertained’ by TW prancing around a rented kitchen and home in various impractical designer outfits (dangling sleeves), sipping ‘bubbles’, flinging her hair around the pots and pans, playing mahjong with her ‘girlfriends’, giving vague gardening tips– all in a bid to advise people on what to eat, and how to live like her. Is ‘elevating’ (another term for trying to make something look posh) food by throwing on flower sprinkles going to make it tastier or healthier? NO!
By far the worst was #Chickengate, and the sight of raw or par boiled chicken legs sitting on a fridge shelf next to other food items is enough to make you become a vegan. Then there was #Wafflegate on St Patrick’s Day, when TW posted a video of her allegedly making green waffles for the invisible children, but the waffle faces didn’t come from the waffle iron that she was using because it had 4 dividers, and the faces were whole. There was a glimpse of a small hand, but whoever filmed it must have stuck a camera right up the nose of the small person to get that shot. Of course, it turns out that there were 2 waffle irons—one for the children, and one for the adults. Why would you bother to use 2 irons, when it’s more than likely the rounds ones were frozen waffles.
Alas, there is no escape from those damned flower sprinkles, as TW arranged a plate of waffles with strawberries and yoghurt. Didn’t she say breakfast was fast and rushed, yet there was time to create some content for social media…
…
The Drew Barrymore interview was hypocrisy at its finest when TW witters on about how you should, ‘find ways to show up for each other’, yet everyone knows that TW can’t be bothered to ‘show up’ for her old Papa, who had been dumped before the wedding. I mean, Harold never even met Thomas Markle, even when they had dated, yet Doria was flown in to meet Harold as soon as possible. She didn’t bother to show up for her daddy before the set-up paparazzi sting incident, so why would anyone trust anything she says? She may not like her siblings, but they are still her blood relatives, yet has she found a way to show up for them?
First of all there is the exchange about the bedtime stories, and she makes a Freudian slip when she says, ‘whoever is with them’ (about the invisible children) and quickly remembers to mention ‘Papa’ rather than Harold, the husband, when she says she videotapes herself pretending to read a story. Most young children know when someone is faking it when people don’t answer back, but then again, this wouldn’t matter with invisible children. Why can’t she, like most parents who work away just make time for them via a video chat at bedtime if that’s the case for we all know that she knows how to create video content?
We all had to laugh when TW claimed that her invisible children still use words with a British accent, in particular, the word ‘zebra’. What a load of baloney— how can children who hadn’t learned to talk yet, and who have never actually lived in the UK have a British accent? The child known as Archie left the UK when he was 5-6 months old (allegedly), and the girl child allegedly spent 72 hours in the UK during the Platinum Jubilee and she wasn’t even a year old. However, no one can even verify the latter, but regardless, a one year old would not have much of a British accent after 3 days, and the child known as Archie was probably gurgling in a British accent. The entire exchange appeared to have been scripted like the other segments, and TW can be seen closing her eyes and blinking to try and remember the answers. The child known as Archie sounds as if he has a southern accent in the released video footage, so perhaps that’s where some of the hired help may have come from.
The Heritage Foundation has been pursuing the DHS to release details of Harold’s visa application, citing that they had concerns that official guidelines may not have been followed, and that he had been given preferential treatment. On 18 March 2025, a number of redacted documents were released, which raised more questions than answers. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67302535/heritage-foundation-v-us-department-of-homeland-security/
In order to get the correct answers, you must ask the right questions. Perhaps it’s not merely a case of whether Harold was truthful about any drug use on his visa application, but…
Was there a visa application? Is that why DHS couldn’t initially find a document that didn’t exist?
What date was given on the visa application? (Was it made retrospectively and which is why some immigration lawyers would see this as a concern and consider it a precedent?)
If the DHS are concerned immigration lawyers would have grounds for ‘legal comments’ if Harold’s visa status was revealed, then it suggests that his visa status was irregular, and may have highlighted issues, such as citing fundraising as an ‘extraordinary ability’.
There has much speculation about what type of visa he entered the US on, but there is confusion too, as Harold arrived in March 2020, and then re-entered in June 2020.
Apparently, Harold is said to have applied for the A-1 visa, but had been advised to apply for an O-1 A visa instead as he would not have been able to work on the former visa. Besides the fact that Harold would not qualify for the A-1 visa, the O-1 visa requires extraordinary ability/talent. Harold’s apparent skill was allegedly listed as ‘fundraising’, and it is believed he used The Royal Foundation as evidence of this (MWX Foundation, the Sussex Royal one had only been in existence since July 2019 and had never filed any accounts), and cited Archewell as a Foundation that had been set up.
Requests have been made to Archewell, for the documents (available to the public on request) they submitted in order to gain charitable status for more than 2 years and they have been ignored, and it’s possible that James Holt assisted in filling out the forms, and used his insider knowledge of The Royal Foundation, where The Royal Foundation was also used as evidence to permit Archewell to have fast tracked charitable status (April 2020). The failure to provide the documents was reported to the IRS, who have also ignored this, but gave a reference number at least. Nothing more has been heard from either Archewell or the IRS on the failure to produce documents that are available to the public on request.
When was Archewell formed though? The domain was registered at the end of February 2020, therefore, Harold could not have made a visa application before this date citing the establishment of his own Foundation.
As far as trademarks go, Archewell Foundation is still pending and is on its 5th extension to provide a SOU (statement of use), and the application wasn’t made until December 2020. The actual website didn’t go live until October 2020, so if Harold had stated that the Archewell Foundation was his ‘extraordinary ability’, then that application could not have been made by March 2020, which is when Harold left Canada for the US, as documented by himself.
The DHS said that by releasing the status of the visa, it may lead to Harold being harassed by the media or public. Why would that be the case if the visa was the correct one issued? Perhaps they have dug a hole that they can’t get out of, especially when Panter (Jarrod Panter, Acting Associate Center Director, Freedom of Information Act & Privacy Act Unit, USCIS National Records Center) issued a declaration of his ‘inconsistent statements’ made in April 2024, that he was correcting. That usually means someone has fibbed and they got caught out (like TW’s ANL case) and have to amend their statements to avoid getting prosecuted, like a sudden memory lapse.
While the question the Heritage Foundation has pursued is whether Harold declared his drug use on the visa applications (and fibbed and/or was given preferential treatment), perhaps they should question whether Harold arrived in the US with a visa, and if so, was it the correct one instead? As we have seen in recent days, people arriving on the wrong visa, or even the correct visa have had their visas revoked for unknown reasons and some have been detained or deported. If the DHS failed to adhere to the visa guidelines and rules when Harold entered the US in March 2020, isn’t that of far greater issue of importance than him fibbing about using drugs on an application form? Either way, the UK doesn’t want him back, but the aim of the civil case was not to have Harold deported, but to ensure that the DHS is doing its job properly, and that it does not make exceptions for people in the public eye. That should be the focus of the case IMHO if they wish to check that the DHS had followed procedures correctly.
