Why The Sussex Line Needs To Be Shut Down
Isn't deliberately attacking the Crown, and undermining members of the RF with falsehoods treasonous?
There is a good reason why in ancient times the families of a traitor or a threat to a power were executed, and that is to prevent their descendants from planning and enacting revenge. That is also why property, land, and titles were removed so that it disabled the enemies and their ability to fund or plan any further attacks. This is why their supporters – their enablers are equally culpable, and their actions can be deemed treasonous. As I read about the Babington Plot against Elizabeth I, I wasn’t suprised to see that the Bellamy family, who provided refuge for the traitors received the same punishment (execution) for aiding them.
The Sussexes are clinging to their waning ‘fame’ through these such enablers – charities that continue to provide publicity for them as their patrons, and companies such as Procter & Gamble who are willing to have a partnership with them. As such, that is why P&G should have their Royal Warrant removed, for how can they hold the warrant under false pretences? It is however up to BP to remove it.
The crime of treason applies to acts or plots to harm the Sovereign or the heir, so under the present law, any harm to William and his family would not be covered by the law – it applies to The Queen, and Charles and Camilla only. However, that has not stopped the Sussexes from attacking all the above, whether directly or indirectly. Looking back at Walsingham’s actions, he needed proof that Mary was involved before Elizabeth I would act, and when he finally got it, she had no choice – it was her or Mary.
However, we have proof that the duo have defamed and attacked the Monarchy, and they have not apologized, but have continued attacking with a trail of inaccurate statements aimed at undermining Charles in particular. One cannot understand why such a person who mounts such attacks against the Crown wishes to retain their place in the order of succession of an institution that they despise and hate? That is not loyalty to the Crown, therefore, Harry (and any descendants) should be removed forthwith.
Harry was seen recently filming the paparazzi, and it makes one wonder what else he may have filmed or recorded while he was in the UK. Would you trust Harry, who seems eager to find another lawsuit to get stuck into for publicity?
Yet, this is a game, for the Sussexes who thrive on the power and status the titles they currently have, and they seek more. If they didn’t care about the titles they could choose not to use them, but instead they use them whenever they can, and even when they shouldn’t.
However, companies and donors are wondering whether they were all that they claimed to be as their true masks are unveiled, and their fancy word salad pitches have ended up on the compost heap. Another recent Archewell hiring has been made for the audio project, because they only did the Christmas special, and well, Christmas 2021 is in 5 months time! Perhaps Spotify are wondering if a Christmas special each year is all that they are getting for their money? To be frank, no one is really interested, and news on Archewell is for the cult, masquerading as a foundation. The bets should be on how long all these recent Sussex hirings will last. I say that most will wait for a Christmas bonus, only to find it will be non-existent, and the wise will have planned their Sussex exit strategy by then…