The Toxic Twerkers Resort To Clickbait For Attention
The new PR team are busy buying new followers and views
The dastardly duo continue on their ‘Prove It’ campaign of clickbait in a bid to convince the world that the once invisible children (who are now faceless) were born of TW’s body. However, no amount of sonograms with no details, blurry bump photos, or videos of them in a hospital room is actual proof that the children were born of body. The only accepted proof is the signature of a practicing doctor who hasn’t been disbarred, stating that they delivered the child, and that they acknowledge that upon signing the declaration they will be convicted of fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud/treason, and treason if they are lying. That would be life imprisonment with no chance of parole.
Naturally, there is nothing wrong with adoption or surrogacy, but if the children were not born of body, that means they would not be entitled to hold any titles (including Earl or Lord or Lady but may use the surname Mountbatten-Windsor), or to be in the line of succession. In short, not much of a meal ticket in terms of monetary worth. That is the actual issue here, not that the children don’t exist, but whether they were born of body, and are eligible to hold titles and be in the line of succession.
Reports claim there are issues over Harold wanting the children to have passports using the HRH style and the newly acquired titles (prince and princess upon C3 ascending the throne), but he fails to understand (or does and is pushing the boundaries) that the HRH style is not automatic, and it is for the monarch to confer to close members of the family when they choose, and that it can be removed too. Passports must also match the name on the birth certificates, and they chose (or did so because they knew the children were not eligible for titles) not to give either child a title that they were entitled to hold (Lord and Lady at the very least). Harold also fails to understand that the HRH with a title means that they are accountable to the public (as public servants) and must be seen in public, hence why Anne refused titles for her children, and why Edward and Sophie’s children may have so far chosen not to use their HRH so that they could lead normal and private lives as much as possible.
By trying to force the UK to issue passports with the desired titles that the Harkles have requested, it may then validate the status of Aldi and Lidl and in some ways validate that they were born of body, even though there is no public proof. Needless to say, this can all be overturned and is not set in stone should further evidence come to light.
By now, it’s commonly accepted that whatever TW or Harold do or say must be treated with extreme wariness and caution as they have both have a history of being less than honest (recollections may vary, and their versions of the truth), and everything should be questioned as to whether it is genuine or truthful. This stems back to when KP denied the topless photos of TW (taken in June 2016) were genuine when they were, with TW’s pals even posting images from the photo set on their social media.
Roth (on the right) deleted them only when the KP announcement saying that they were fake came out in 2018, even though they had been visible for over a year. If TW and KP can lie about a harmless topless photo, then what else will they lie about, and can they be trusted? KP can only state what they are told by TW, but by lying to the public, there is a loss of trust and confidence that is hard to regain.
On 4 June 2025, the world was subjected to what can only be described as a vulgar, tacky, and distasteful video of the duo allegedly twerking in a hospital room, allegedly prior to the birth of the girl child on 4 June 2021. There is no actual proof that the video was taken on that day or if it is in fact even authentic (as in not modified or edited) except for the word of TW.
The video followed a flurry of social media posts from TW who is keen to promote the girl child known by the masses as Lidl (I won’t use the name as it is disrespectful to the late Queen whose childhood nickname they stole without her permission), who was allegedly celebrating her 4th birthday.
The new PR team was very busy, where on 31 May 2025, TW had 2.7 million followers, and by 4 June 2025, 3 million, and on 9 June 2025, it rose to 3.7 million (having been stagnant since February 2025).
Hardly organic growth, and some fast buying of followers and likes seemed to have transpired in a week, but why is that so important and why don’t they care that the media response is negative? This is because more followers are essential for brand collaborations and for sponsors and that’s how TW appears to be trying to make money as no one is booking her for any speaking gigs.
The PR team might think it’s a ‘win’ as they have ticked the boxes on the forms, but brands do take note of negative press around celebrities and the fact is that the ‘twerk video’ may have had a high number of views and likes, but the majority of the media coverage and comments are negative, and it would be commercial suicide to associate with someone who has a toxic following and who is mocked by the masses.
How odd that TW chose birthday images that focused on her and not the child, where the images were highly retouched, with TW’s hands positioned prominently showing off her rings and jewellery (I’m married to a fox prince you know). There goes the ‘prove it’ game again, with a new mother who has time for a perfect manicure, and TW who looks as if she is pinning the girl down, holding down her leg and the other arm preventing her from moving. The focus was on TW, rather than the sad eyes of a child whose dress was hoisted up exposing her legs and her elbow trapped by TW’s arm. Hardly a happy image to share on a birthday.
There isn’t anything wrong with a couple videoing themselves while they await the arrival of their baby, but the twerker’s video was made for clickbait and content, so was it genuine? One should don a deerstalker hat and put themselves in the shoes of Sherlock Holmes and look at the video and what is there, and what is wrong with the scenario, and balance that with the facts.
Having spoken to a number of midwives and other medical professionals, they are of the opinion that the video is not genuine and is in fact irresponsible if overdue high risk pregnant women follow suit with energetic gyrating.
Fact: If this was during the Covid-19 lockdown in June 2021, then everyone should be wearing masks to avoid the spread of infection. Neither TW or Harold were seen to be wearing masks.
Fact: During Covid-19, hospital protocols were strict, and patients wearing external clothing should change into a gown to avoid contamination on sterile hospital bedding. Others should wear protective gowns and PPE. The bed looks used, but TW is not wearing a hospital gown.
Fact : A cannula should be inserted into the arm that is free of watches or jewellery because they can damage the cannula. A patient is advised not to move the arm too much or vigorously as it can loosen or damage the cannula. TW is seen with a cannula and on the same arm are a number of bracelets and bangles and a watch. She is also seen moving her arms vigorously raising them and shaking them around. People can buy cannulas online and are easily accessible, therefore it is possible for someone to tape one on for effect.
Fact : This was a high risk pregnancy by TW’s own admission having claimed to have allegedly suffered a miscarriage less than 12 months ago in July 2020. Choose a version of the story (the day she moved into the house, when Abigail Spencer met her on the driveway, or when she was in the nursery picking up the child known as Archie after making breakfast). The risk was allegedly so severe that the ANL court case was adjourned on medical grounds in October 2020, where TW revealed she’d had a miscarriage via the New York Times, and presumably that the stress of the case would cause another miscarriage. This was conveniently timed as TW had asked for an extension twice to avoid providing 3 months of communications between her and her 5 anonymous People magazine pals (via a court order), and her time was up and she was due to produce copies of the communications within a week. Therefore, if the pregnancy was so high risk that stress alone would endanger her life, should she have been basically do a dance that most lap dancers do in strip clubs in a hospital room? TW later claimed to have suffered from postpartum preeclampsia, again suggesting that she had been high risk, so again, should she have been doing an energetic lap dance prior to the birth that could cause damage to the blood vessels and blood pressure (causes of postpartum preeclampsia)? Both a miscarriage and postpartum preeclampsia are possible as long as a uterus is present, and many media outlets have deleted comments that make reference to one not being present in either of the Harkles.
Fact: Harold claimed they ate burgers (in Spare) prior to arriving at the hospital yet In-N-Out Burger doesn’t open until 10:30 am and the girl was allegedly born at 11:40 am. If the duo stayed overnight, why wasn’t TW in a gown? “We ended up eating In-N-Out burgers and fajitas in the hospital room, then dancing like maniacs.” (They only had an hour then if the burger place didn’t open until 10.30 am). Pregnant women about to give birth are not permitted to eat should the need for an emergency c-section arise.
Everyone has chipped in with an opinion on the video, and for many it is distasteful and should have remained private especially with TW’s squatting actions that could be considered NSFW.
The opinion of the midwives I have been in contact with say that this is not genuine as only an incompetent nurse would insert an cannula into arm full of jewellery (a nurse would insist on all items being removed), and that they would not advise a high risk patient to gyrate so vigorously and energetically, and consider it irresponsible of TW as others may consider that sort of action is safe.
They also say that at that stage of a pregnancy, a bump should not be able to move up and down, and that it would have dropped, and the mother would have an arched back to support themselves. In addition the ‘shifting’ shape of the backside that drops to the middle of the legs would mean that it would not be possible to squat without losing some balance. I’m listing the obvious observations as there are some people that cannot see what should be there and what isn’t.
The content was not spontaneous and looks rehearsed and planned, and there were probably several takes as TW knows her mark, and the camera is set up in a position where she is the focus. Therefore, the video was made for public consumption with furniture moved and the camera set up to focus on TW.
Is there evidence this was filmed in June 2021? No masks seem to have been worn which was compulsory at the time. There is no evidence to prove when this was filmed.
The room looks used with water jugs used and the bed has also been used. This would be unusual for a couple who just arrived and due to Covid-19 protocols, TW should have been in a gown. While others claim they stayed in their own clothes for hours while waiting to give birth, this was during Covid-19 where wearing of your own clothes would not be permitted due to possible contamination.
The bump basically looks like a sack of potatoes with lumps. Others have claimed it is the fetal monitor that is causing the bumps, but doesn’t explain why TW isn’t in a gown, or why the bump isn’t round but is shaped like a bag of groceries in a cheap plastic carrier bag.
TW’s rear end shifts shape and drops about 6 inches while she is dancing. Some may say it’s the fetal monitor again, but surely if the monitor was slipping, wouldn’t she be concerned about making sure it was secure?
Everyone has chipped in with an opinion on the video, and for many it is distasteful and should have remained private especially with TW’s squatting actions that could be considered NSFW.
The main red flag is the cannula ‘on the arm’ because we can’t tell if it actually was active and inserted due to the fact that no competent nurse would insert one when the patient is wearing several bracelets and a watch right next to cannula (as it could tear and damage the cannula). Either the nurse was incompetent and had no business being there, or the cannula was ‘fake’ and taped on for the purposes of the video.
Was this a PR exercise to gain more followers, likes and views in order to entice more brands to collaborate? It certainly appears to have come from the PR textbook on how to gain views and likes quickly. Often an advert will appear saying to follow an account and then to like the last 2-3 posts before they get paid to make it look like engagement so they won’t get picked up as a bot. I’ve seen them, and often they are for YouTube videos, e-books, competitions that need votes, and social media accounts that need followers with engagement.
The video and posts were pure clickbait and many critics have ‘fallen’ into the Harkle PR trap, and added to the views, which is what the PR team wanted, and they don’t care about the negative comments and articles because they just wanted the figures to send to prospective collaborators.
As you can see, the recent posts with the newly purchased followers have more ‘likes’ because they only have to like the recent posts to get paid. They may have thought of this as a ‘win’ but it’s quite obvious that acquiring 1 million followers in less than 10 days is suspect, but it’s a numbers game to them and they don’t care what people think or care that the followers aren’t even real.
You only have to look at the As ever social media account (where TW fans are) and that account doesn’t even have a million followers because there appears to be no budget for that account. This was just another PR stunt that TW had planned, again to make money and this time it was to monetise the birthday of the girl child. A few days later, there was a ‘freebie’ Disneyland trip, and both Harold and TW are grinning. At last, their titles are getting them some freebies that they long for and covet. Who will be the next sucker?
