The Sussexes are like the annoying drip of a tap that dribbles, and that needs to be chucked out and replaced. Their PR campaign continues to drip feed bits of useless information and contrived images, where the only audience is the brainwashed cult. The photoshop photographer is the latest lackey, who has been using his social media accounts to promote the duo. Misan Harriman, is the current favourite, who seems to have spent a month retouching the images for TW and TOS. How much soft lighting can one use before it looks laughably fake? The awkward poses, staged, with the cringeworthy hand holding as rehearsed by TW, show her controlling the image she wishes to convey, while TOS plays along as the puppet, grinning, as the lackey adds a few extra strands of hair to his bald patch. There is the usual show of smarmy arrogance in the poses—the only question left is when will the lackey get ‘Harkled’.
However, most people expected a wave of some sugary paid for PR, in time to promote the frankly boring, and pointless Spotify podcasts that were about to resume after the funeral of the Queen. We all know that it is utter rubbish, useless, and a waste of time—Spotify knows it, the media know it, and people with active brains cells know it. I pity the poor reporters that are being paid by the tabloids to listen to it and to report on it. I hope that their employers offer some free therapy, and not from BetterUp. No one cares about the podcasts, and no one who is sane will waste their time on it either.
The latest is on ‘demystifying the dragon lady’ with Margaret Cho (never heard of her and have no interest either)—what is there to demystify FFS? It’s an old stereotype based on strong Asian women that you didn’t mess with. I don’t know much about Cho, but apparently as a comedian she has imitated and mocked her mother’s accent. That kind of behaviour is never respectful, and people who find it amusing should take a good look in the mirror at their pitiful souls.
We might wonder why the PR circus had started up again, and it’s all deflection as usual. On 30 September 2022, when the photoshop photographer released some uninteresting images from One Young World, that was the same day that TW had filed to try and prevent TOS from being a witness in the case Samantha Markle is pursuing against TW for defamation.
Samantha has listed at least a number witnesses, that would make for a jolly Markle gathering. Oprah Winfrey is included, as is Doria, and the Finding Freedom authors. TW is trying to halt the process of gathering witness statements, while she still attempts to get the lawsuit thrown out. I think the witness party is one that we would all like to see live streamed!
It seemed that the media weren’t interested in either story, and the gossip, and paid for media outlets don’t count. On the same day (30 September 2022), Putin was illegally annexing parts of Ukraine, escalating the possibility of a World War. No one cares about the Markle family squabbles, or what the Harkles did in Manchester either, as neither are newsworthy issues.
There was a further drip feed of images from the lackey, again from the One Young World ‘thing’ in Manchester. I’m sure the duo had planned some glamorous images at the WellChild awards to be used later on, but the Queen reigned (sic) on their parade and plans that had to be cancelled (I hope they had good insurance to cover the costs). The heavily retouched images were again largely ignored by the media, with only the paid for US outlets (from specific publishing companies) taking any notice.
The release seems to have served a dual function, some PR to remind people of the yawn inducing podcast, and I don’t know whether it was to promote of deflect from the defamation claim TOS is pursuing against the Daily Mail (ANL). The Sussex PR might think highlighting it is a promotional move (one that no one bar Royston has taken any notice of), but upon reading it, I would have said it was more of a deflection to prevent people reading the feeble whines and weak claims from TOS.
Other outlets claimed the images were released to compete with recent images of the Sovereign and his heir. I doubt it, as you can’t compete when you aren’t in the same league. Much has been made of the recent statement made by Queen Margrethe of Denmark, where she has opted to remove the titles of the grandchildren of her youngest son, as they will not be representing the monarchy and has done so in order to ‘free’ them of any royal restrictions and obligations. The grandchildren and their parents did not take the news well, and complained in the press, even though the move was not unexpected as the same has happened in other Royal Houses in Europe, and that the family had been informed of the plans for a number of years.
As people are living longer, a slimmed down monarchy was inevitable across all of Europe. Working members of a Royal Family have the titles in order to represent the country, and if they aren’t working members, then do they need the titles? It seems that they don’t, as current monarchs have removed the titles from the descendants who will not be working members of Royal Family. Only the US media seem to fail grasp this, perhaps through a lack of education or pure ignorance? They seem to believe that the invisible children have the prince and princess titles, and while they are entitled to them, it doesn’t mean that they officially have been conferred.
The question Charles must answer, is whether the invisible children will be working members of the Royal Family, and that is highly unlikely, therefore, as TW and TOS didn’t want to their ‘children’ to have titles, then why would Charles give them something that they have publicly stated they don’t want? It would be pointless giving UK titles to children who have not lived in the UK, and are unlikely to do so. Basically, it would serve little purpose, unlike Charles conferring the Duke of Edinburgh title to his brother as promised. That would serve a purpose, and if Charles is seeking brownie points from the People, then he’d better get a move on as the honeymoon period is nearly over.