How Did No.24 Aquire The 'I Voted' Sticker?
Has Archewell become a political propaganda platform?
Halloween was last week, but what a fright some of us had when the image of TW/No.24 appeared in a manufactured pose complete with the eyes of Norman Bates, and the grin of the Joker. What was she advertising? The Archewell business, a new cheap orange bronzer, or the ‘I voted’ sticker?
The chances are that she, like most activists voted early by mail or used a ballot drop box, so how did she get the sticker? I mean, we can’t imagine her standing in line, and if she was going to vote in person surely Netflix would be right behind her? The slightly creased sticker would look more authentic if the photo was taken outside the polling place, or did she get a creased sticker in the mail? Cast your own votes!
Did someone pinch a sheet of stickers, or did a lowly member of staff offer their repurposed sticker up for PR purposes? Is this a genuine representation of what actually happened, as in was TW given the sticker as she left the polling place when she voted?
Has Archewell become a political platform telling people that they must vote as their civic duty? Surely being a decent human comes first, one who doesn’t lie or spread false accusations or misinformation? Reviews on the company/business/ entity say otherwise.
First of all, Archewell was going to be a charitable foundation/entity, and now both TOS and TW admit it is a business that they are growing—is that another phrase for fleecing people for donations that they can redistribute? The content is in the style of a cult handbook, something out of the Handmaid’s Tale in Gilead. Are the duo using the royal ducal titles to entice an audience to create their own cult, first by looking charitable (as most cults start off to attract the vulnerable) and then indoctrinating them once they have their details and keep them in their grasp? That would be truly horrifying, especially if the British Royal Family enabled them by failing to restrict or remove the ducal titles which give them faux credibility and an assumed measure of respect and trust.
Ultimately, what we have is a reject royal (and their current spouse) using a royal title to make money, and who use the said title to advertise their business that draws in people who presume that there is a royal connection, and thus with it comes an assumption of credibility and security of the business. Many will consider the British Royal Family to be a weak institution by allowing themselves to be manipulated by rogue rejects. By all means, TOS and TW can be political activists as Mr and Mrs Windsor, but would TW have pulled this ‘sticker’ stunt with the Queen or is she daring the new King to do what should be done, and that is to remove the ducal title so it can’t be exploited and abused?