A Paid For 'Award' And VING–The Snowflake Project
VING censors comments that question the project on social media
Who would have thought that VING was being run by a bunch of snowflakes? Well, the odds were that anyone associated with TW or TOS were going to have snowflake tendencies. A reader who is a mother and grandmother was concerned about teenagers providing personal data to a third party (VING) without them understanding the consequences. The website says that the users must ‘promise’ to gain the permission of an adult before using the website—is that a virtual pinky promise?
They took to Facebook to express their concerns. Instead of VING reassuring her that there were safety measures, VING reported the comment as ‘bullying’ and ‘abusive’ , and the poster was banned for 48 hours by Facebook, and the comment was hidden. I asked what she wrote, and she still had the draft, and I asked if I could share it publicly, seeing as VING and Facebook wanted to censor her.
Read it for yourself and decide if the comment warranted being reported by VING, and if Facebook should censor valid opinions and concerns.
I would urge caution to all parents/guardians of minors who are considering participating in this project. Please pay close attention to the fact that by allowing your minor to provide them with such private and personal information, you are authorizing them to provide your minors personal/private information to a third party, meaning any party that offers them money for their list.
This means they have the ability to provide your minors private information to any religious, political, activist cause they so choose. They have the right to manipulate your minor in anyway they see fit, and you have no control over it. If they want to put your minor in a bikini and plaster it all over in a giant billboard, they have the right to do so, forever.
Any parent/guardian who has had a minor affected by online bullying, or pedophile will warn you about these dangers! They have the ability to locate your minor just by using photo recognition software. You should also realize, by giving up your minors right to privacy, you are also naively giving up your own right to privacy. There are far too many other excellent organizations that provide needed help that refuse to allow their info going to third parties and instead steadfastly retain the integrity your child's, and your, right to privacy. Please think about your child's privacy and safety, as well as your own, first and foremost.
VING considered the above an abusive post and Facebook censored it. In fact, there are few social media comments or interactions on all their platforms, and is that because of the snowflakes in control who can’t handle comments that don’t praise them?
No one is surprised that the Sussexes have bought another award, this time from the Robert F Kennedy Humans Rights organisation. The award winners, bar Zelenskyy appear to have ‘paid’ for nominations and for the accolade of what is a useless award. Pay for publicity it seems, and I imagine Zelenskyy would happily trade in all the awards he has received for a no-fly zone over Ukraine.
The Ripple of Hope laureate winners were announced back in July 2022, then on 6 October, President Zelenskyy was added as an additional winner. Then out of the blue several days later the Sussexes were added as additional winners. Talking about making it obvious that the Archewell donation had cleared. We know that other awards have been purchased (NAACP) and this one is no different is seems. There was also a Sunshine Sachs association, where the PR company appeared to have been handling the organisation’s media up until about 2 years ago.
Kerry Kennedy, makes herself look foolish by applauding the ‘work’ of a foundation that is barely two years old and that has achieved little except to loan a royal ducal title to promotional material. Archewell donated money from other people to promote causes that they wished to highlight, which suited TW and TOS’s personal narratives to gain supporters and donors. Have they personally raised funds? There is no evidence that they have done so.
In praising people who have abused a royal title for money, and who have been proven to have misled the public in a court of law, and to make harmful and false allegations about a Monarch and their family, Kennedy disgraces the Kennedy name. It makes the awards look farcical, and no one will take the awards or the organisation seriously. In addition, Kennedy didn’t bother to highlight on her social media that Zelenskyy (who deserves the award more than anyone) had been given the award on 6 October, but gave the unworthy duo a mention on her social media several days later. Really? Out of the two, she thought the Sussexes had done more for humanity than Zelenskyy who is fighting for democracy for the world, literally with the blood of Ukrainians? Seriously Kerry Kennedy, is this the best that you can do? Shame on you.
The only ripple of hope that we have is that they never return to the UK, and that C3 strips them of their titles, and removes TOS as a Counsellor of State. C3 may well be waiting to see what TOS has written in his ghost written memoir, but I don’t know why. Is C3 really expecting TOS to write nice things about him and Camilla? As he hasn’t said particularly nice things in public recently, it’s a pretty good bet that he’s not going to say nice things about the Royal Family, or the Monarchy in the book, because he has been attacking both in public during interviews that have been televised with his approval.