MWX and the End of the House of Sussex?

Money has always seemed important to the duo, but how does HMRC and the IRS see things?

Harry has always complained of money, and that he doesn’t have enough, while TW seems to crave money and ostentatious signs of wealth, in a bid to impress others. Are they in debt, or are they living beyond their means? Did they need to live in such a huge mansion that they couldn’t actually afford? Money seems to be moving around an awful lot…

Questions have always arisen over the nature of the Sussex companies that seemed to file for voluntary liquidation before the accounts are due, and MWX Trading Ltd appears to be the latest. Will this be the fate of Travalyst at some point, where the accounts aren’t due until January 2022? The confirmation statement is already late…

https://harrymarkle.wordpress.com/2021/05/20/the-duo-we-wish-we-didnt-have-to-see/

With the revelation of the ‘lies’ and false documents behind the Diana interview being unearthed, this will mean Harry will play the Diana victim card yet again, but the BBC being involved is damning to say the least. It’s too early to say what can or will happen, but no doubt it will be used by Harry and the cult to attack the RF, yet this was not a tabloid but a formerly respected journalist and a public broadcasting station.

BP aims to be subtle, but do their tactics work? Should they be employing tactics when they need to garner and maintain public respect and loyalties? When the masses see through their attempts, surely they should simply opt for a degree of honesty? While the public were glad they ignored the Sussexes on 19 May, was it fair to use Bea, even if she agreed to it?

There are many questions that the public seek answers for, yet no one wishes to come clean as yet. We saw some NDAs in BP being lifted due to public pressure, but how many people are being silenced at the detriment of the Nation? There comes a time when people must decide what is in the best interests of the Nation and the People when other parties are incapable of making decisions that are impartial. In my book, covering up a crime or illegal acts is not in the best interests of justice, and using NDAs to hide such acts questions the legality of any confidentiality clauses, rendering them essentially void. NDAs exist to keep things confidential, and are not meant to hide dubious or illegal acts, and crimes. When they are, those who enforce such NDAs need to consider the legality, ethics, and morals of their actions (IMHO of course).