A mere 72 hours after Justice Warby found in favour of MM’s claim on misuse of private information (that had already been in the public domain in part), the Sussex PR team had the green light to go ahead with the release of their planned PR projects. They had to be on hold, because you can’t win a privacy case in court when you erm, release worldwide publicity photos of private moments (well, staged for public consumption like the Letter). Nor can you when you announce that you will do a ‘tell all’ interview that will reveal private information into the public domain, including private thoughts.
We had the remote ipad photo taken by Misan Harriman, who stated he met MM through the mutual friend who introduced her to Harry. That would be mutual pal Misha Nonoo, who was then married to Alexander Gilkes. Nonoo was in turn was introduced to MM by Markus Anderson, but that’s how networking is. Most are calculated introductions, and Harriman is milking his 15 minutes of fame.
He goes on about the garden of fertility and tree of life that they posed in, all the symbolism that you pretend exists when you analyze a Hardy novel (or similar) because it’s easier than telling your teacher it’s a load of BS. The shoot was set up, and no doubt the backdrop was chosen as was the fake pose (Notting Hill). As we know from the nude Greek holiday photos, MM knows how to set up a tripod and to stage PR images on the cheap.
https://harrymarkle.wordpress.com/2021/02/16/the-sussexes-publicly-bear-their-souls-soles-but-want-privacy/
I have given a rundown of the last 48 hours, and many members of the public are suffering from Sussex Sickness – a fatigue that renders you anxious and angry when you hear their names. When you hear the words, ‘The Duke and Duchess of…’, you freeze, but are relieved when you hear the word Cambridge. The word Sussex though, can lead to high blood pressure, and the need to crack open a bottle of something to calm your nerves.
The Oprah angle was no surprise, but it is all American with Gayle King promoting it, and some media outlets jumping on that bandwagon. I wonder what companies have agreed to pay ridiculous amounts to have their ads shown during the 90 minute special? Perhaps watching the 90 minutes can be a new method of torture? Did Oprah think she’d get that invite for free? MM never does anything for free, and it’s time for Oprah to pay up, while she still has a production company.
Will the Americans warm to either OW or MM? In the UK, frankly no one gives a damn. The show is due to be aired on 7 March, 2021, the day before Commonwealth Day, but we are coming out of lockdown (allegedly) on 8th March. Children will be preparing to go back to school that weekend, and friends can legally meet in the park for a coffee. That’s real life, and these are things that affect us and not the whines of the Sussexes. People will be too busy planning to adapt to a new normality, and no one will have time for the wastrels.
https://harrymarkle.substack.com/p/petition-a-message-to-her-majesty/comments#comment-list
(Please click above the sign the petition)
The review date was due to be on 31 March, 2021, but even loyalists who have supported The Queen to wait until then have turned, and D-Day should be 6 March, 2021 – the day before the interview is broadcast. Calls for the removal of the dukedom, titles, patronages, military titles, and for Harry to be removed from the order of succession have been made for more than a year, as the abuse of the titles began before they officially left the RF. Now is the time to see action, as there are some whiffs that the patronages have gone already, and the interview is a way for the Harkles to tell the world that they chose to step down from the patronages and to relinquish the titles.
The depth of the Harkle hypocrisy is so deep, that even those who have not followed this saga can see it and have questioned it. Yet there is a posse of cult followers that appear to indulge the sycophantic duo. At least they won’t accuse Warby of being biased, just the rest of the sane population of the world will instead. He couldn’t win either way – criticized by nutters, or by the sane folks in the world. That’s what BP faces now, but there is much more at stake than appeasing some unhinged nutters, and that is the legacy of the Monarchy, and of the reputation of a nation. As in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, the Grail Knight reminded them to choose wisely. To make a poor choice will lead to consequences that cannot be undone. They cannot wing this one, and a virtual execution is the only option. At least they get to keep their heads in this century…
The question of patronages has finally reared its head. Once their royal status is effectively stripped, then they can still be patrons of those that are not associated with The Queen, they just won't be royal. They have effectively tarnished the exclusive nature and prestige of having a royal patron.
The DM has contacted all the bodies concerned, and all bar WellChild have been reluctant to comment. WellChild have worked with Harry for years, and he likes them because he can use them whenever he wants to make a speech on anything. They like him because he was always available, and would host fundraisers. For those who haven't been on the other side of fundraising dinners or award ceremonies, it's not so glittery at all. The pressure is on to get donations from the tables (in addition to buying the table), and where do you think all the money comes from to pay for glittery events and dinners and the staff (they all get paid well)?
He can keep Invictus, because he founded it (with help), but as for the others? He is still a Prince by birth, so long as he isn't representing The Queen, no one cares.
As for MM, let her keep the dogs and their £10 a month, and the second hand clothes charities because those are tarnished and sold their souls for PR. The others need to reassigned.
I also see The Times is saying that MM met Oprah once, but no one says how or where. It could have been a 'Hi' at a party once, and that counts as meeting. If it is an attempt to say that they knew each other, then that failed. Everyone knows at those parties that you 'meet' so many, but it's all for appearances.
Whilst I welcome opinions and discussion, I don't allow conspiracy theories or people to hijack posts with their own agendas. As such, suspect posters (as in those who don't even sign the petition but are prolific posters) will get short bans.
This is because it is unfair to those who wish to post and discuss issues, and when I can see a poster has their own agenda, then that stops. I have already banned several posters who have made others uncomfortable.